So other than a few comments about typos and such, Ric and I have gotten few comments about our online teaching portfolios (at www.lamonte-bird.com if you haven’t seen them yet). I’m going to take the silence as approval, but if you do have comments we’re very interested to know what you think.
However I did get some feedback on my teaching portfolio the other day. Although it came from a respected source, it was feedback that I didn’t really agree with. The response I wrote made me think about my basic understanding of what it means to be a teacher, and I thought it worthwhile to share my thoughts with all (3) of you who read this blog.
First the comment:
Well !! I was finally able to find your and Richard’s [teaching portfolio]. Very interesting. I envy you your accomplishments in that sophisticated world of academia but as someone once said,”Give us the tools and we will finish the job.” A [teachers' college professor] of ours would always start her lesson with, “Now, take your little six year old…..” You are paid to give them the tools. To keep happy and effective, think short term. Leave the philosophy with those who have nothing concrete to work on.
And my response:
I had to think long and hard before I sent this response to you. I think I owe it to myself and to you to be intellectually honest, and not repress or hide my thoughts and opinions for any reason. So here you go:
Socrates once said that “an unexamined life is not worth living.” In the same spirit I would say that an teacher unwilling to examine herself, and her teaching practice, is not worth learning from. A teacher who doesn’t consider the implications of what she does in the classroom on a daily basis should not be given the ultimate responsibility of teaching children, who are the future of our society.
Some believe that all a teacher does is give children ‘the tools’ of reading, ‘riting, and ‘rithmatic. While I certainly do give my students those basic skills to function in society, I also feel a compunction to give them the ability to understand, critique, and change their world. I must think carefully about who my students are, and who they are becoming, in order to give them the best possible education that I can.
To imply that philosophy is not concrete or valuable is to discard the greatest achievements that humans have made. To ignore the inner world of thought and imagination makes people out to be nothing more than automatons that need to be trained to function well (and not ask questions) in order to keep our economy and status quo stable.
I hope that you were simply playing the devil’s advocate, and that you do not truly believe what you wrote to me about teaching. I find the idea I am simply “paid to give them the tools” and that I should therefore “leave the philosophy with those who have nothing concrete to work on” soul-sapping and depressing. In the same way that Socrates chose death before silence, I would choose to stop teaching rather than stop thinking about how and why I teach.
I appreciate you sharing your point of view with me. I suppose this exchange simply shows how dramatically teacher education, and the teaching profession, have changed. I hope that you can understand and respect my point of view. From the first weeks of teachers’ college I have learned to be a philosophical and self-reflective teacher. I like and respect myself as a teacher, but believe that being critical and philosophical about my practice is the only way to improve.
I’m interested in what other think about this exchange (I just sent the response a few minutes ago, if there are more developments I’ll let you know).